<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Plasma Vs LCD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plasmavslcd.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org</link>
	<description>Everything You Need To Know Before Buying An HDTV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Budget Plasma TV by Sui</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/best-budget-plasma-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Sui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=24#comment-29</guid>
		<description>One thing to consider with these three sets is if you plan you use it with a stereo/home theatre system.  If you use an older stereo with analog inputs only then the Samsung PN42C450 is the only logical choice - it&#039;s the only one of these three that even still has an analog 1/8&quot; stereo miniplug for analog audio output.  The Panasonic and the LG only have digital audio outputs.

Otherwise one will be forced to either buy a home theatre audio system that has the digital inputs needed or you will have to buy an analog to digital converter.  Bottom line is you will likely end up spending an additional $100 (or more) just to get either the Panasonic or the LG TV patched into your older stereo system, and since budget is of the mind&#039;s eye here, that ultimately defeats the purpose.

One last comment - Samsung model also offers the PN42C430 - which is essentially identical to the PN42C450 except that is has two HDMI inputs instead of three.  Average cost is about 40 USD less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing to consider with these three sets is if you plan you use it with a stereo/home theatre system.  If you use an older stereo with analog inputs only then the Samsung PN42C450 is the only logical choice &#8211; it&#8217;s the only one of these three that even still has an analog 1/8&#8243; stereo miniplug for analog audio output.  The Panasonic and the LG only have digital audio outputs.</p>
<p>Otherwise one will be forced to either buy a home theatre audio system that has the digital inputs needed or you will have to buy an analog to digital converter.  Bottom line is you will likely end up spending an additional $100 (or more) just to get either the Panasonic or the LG TV patched into your older stereo system, and since budget is of the mind&#8217;s eye here, that ultimately defeats the purpose.</p>
<p>One last comment &#8211; Samsung model also offers the PN42C430 &#8211; which is essentially identical to the PN42C450 except that is has two HDMI inputs instead of three.  Average cost is about 40 USD less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Used HDTV Buying Guide – Plasma TV – LCD TVs by sharp aquos 32</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/used-hdtv-buying-guide/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>sharp aquos 32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=179#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;sharp aquos 32...&lt;/strong&gt;

One last note: As announced in most other HDTV on the show, plasma or LCD, while Panasonic Plasma Energy Star 4. 0. On the one hand, we expect them to use less energy than the standard last year, but on the other side, we are all programs that do not d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>sharp aquos 32&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>One last note: As announced in most other HDTV on the show, plasma or LCD, while Panasonic Plasma Energy Star 4. 0. On the one hand, we expect them to use less energy than the standard last year, but on the other side, we are all programs that do not d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VIZIO 42-inch Class LCD HDTV 120Hz 1080p E420VL by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/vizio-42-inch-class-lcd-hdtv-120hz-1080p-e420vl/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/vizio-42-inch-class-lcd-hdtv-120hz-1080p-e420vl/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;aquos sharp...&lt;/strong&gt;

Several men and women state LCD sets are very best when you play video games on the TV or desire for you to hook your TV Monitor up for you to a personal computer. LCD’ s are less likely to undergo from the burn in effect. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>aquos sharp&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Several men and women state LCD sets are very best when you play video games on the TV or desire for you to hook your TV Monitor up for you to a personal computer. LCD’ s are less likely to undergo from the burn in effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Budget Plasma TV by Fire Basket</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/best-budget-plasma-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Fire Basket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=24#comment-22</guid>
		<description>i think that plasma tvs are more expensive than LCD tvs and they are a bit heavier too ;,-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that plasma tvs are more expensive than LCD tvs and they are a bit heavier too ;,-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Budget Plasma TV by Soap Dispenser ·</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/best-budget-plasma-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Soap Dispenser ·</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=24#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Plasma TVs still have much better contrast ratio compared to even the best LCD television      ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plasma TVs still have much better contrast ratio compared to even the best LCD television      ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LED vs LCD TVs &#8211; What&#8217;s the Difference? LED Advantages by Photoelectric Smoke Detector :</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/led-vs-lcd-tvs-whats-the-difference-led-advantages/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoelectric Smoke Detector :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=19#comment-16</guid>
		<description>LCD TVs are the mainstream stuff that you can buy today but their contrast ratio isn&#039;t that great compard to CRT&#039;s                       _</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LCD TVs are the mainstream stuff that you can buy today but their contrast ratio isn&#8217;t that great compard to CRT&#8217;s                       _</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plasma Vs LED Video by RFID Chip :</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/plasma-vs-led-video/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>RFID Chip :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=6#comment-15</guid>
		<description>currently, there are no TRUE LEDtv these days but they are actually LED backlit LCD tvs      &quot;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>currently, there are no TRUE LEDtv these days but they are actually LED backlit LCD tvs      &#8220;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Long Do Plasma TVs Last? by Afiong</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/how-long-do-plasma-tvs-last/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Afiong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasmavslcd.org/?p=29#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I am going to buy a flat screen tv at the end of November. Hands down what is the best plasma  (over 50&quot; for around $1000) and the best LCD (under 32&quot; for around $400). Also should Iget it during black Friday? I have heard the brands that are sold are poor quality brands.

Thanks
Afiong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to buy a flat screen tv at the end of November. Hands down what is the best plasma  (over 50&#8243; for around $1000) and the best LCD (under 32&#8243; for around $400). Also should Iget it during black Friday? I have heard the brands that are sold are poor quality brands.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Afiong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plasma Vs LCD by Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.plasmavslcd.org/plasma-vs-lcd/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plasmavslcd.org/?p=3#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Great info and succinct.  Information I&#039;d like to know more about:  DLP (laser DLP), new technologies on the horizon (6 month - 1 year), old technologies at the lower end (I&#039;ve heard rumors that LCD/LED will supplant plasma, also heard DLP may not be around very much longer).

Thanks for your contributions.
Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info and succinct.  Information I&#8217;d like to know more about:  DLP (laser DLP), new technologies on the horizon (6 month &#8211; 1 year), old technologies at the lower end (I&#8217;ve heard rumors that LCD/LED will supplant plasma, also heard DLP may not be around very much longer).</p>
<p>Thanks for your contributions.<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

